User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 83.98.52.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 231 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters containing no spaces, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 43.249.196.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On User talk:43.249.196.179 (diff): Technically, this is block evasion of User:43.249.196.179, an IP which was blocked ten days ago for 3-months length with no talk page access after they abused it. If we really want to stop the person behind this IP then the IP range is 43.249.196.0/24; I'll leave it up to the admins whether to block the latest IP or to rangeblock. — AP 499D25 (talk) 07:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- 94.191.136.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Vandalism and socking [1] . Kajmer05 (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2025
- 89.197.60.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. The AP (talk) 09:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- B sakthivelan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Cameron Pictures (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username and implying shared use. Editing Law & Order Toronto: Criminal Intent which is developed by Tassie Cameron. Adakiko (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Digintal (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (digintal.com). —Bruce1eetalk 09:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request protection for the Wikipedia page [Kundalpur Jain Temple (Bade Baba)] due to persistent vandalism and misinformation being added by certain individuals. The temple is a highly significant religious site for followers of the Digambar sect of Jainism, yet the page has repeatedly been altered with incorrect information, likely motivated by sectarian bias.
Nature of the Issue
1.Misinformation on Managing Body: The temple is managed by Shri Digambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, but vandals have changed this to Shri Shwetambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Kundalpur Public Trust, which is factually incorrect.
2.Religious and Cultural Sensitivity: The temple holds immense importance for the Digambar Jain community. The repeated alterations appear to stem from hate or jealousy, which disrespects the faith and beliefs of millions.
Evidence of Vandalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bade_Baba_Temple&diff=1270028436&oldid=1268410418
16:28, 9 January 2025 User12231
15:40, 17 January 2025 Uts v Jain
Request for Protection
Given the sensitivity of the topic and the repeated vandalism, I kindly request:
1. Semi-protection: Restrict edits to registered and confirmed users.
2. Long-term protection: Given the likelihood of continued attempts at misinformation, I request protection for an extended period.
This will help ensure that the article maintains its accuracy and neutrality, in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Protecting this page would not only prevent further disruption but also respect the sentiments of the Jain community, particularly the Digambar sect.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if further details or evidence are needed.
Sincerely,
Anonymous 92.99.127.127 (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Forgiving the format and length here, you do realize that you will be unable to edit the article if it gets semi-protected? Daniel Case (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Week long edit warring by 2 parties. Reported at ANI here. Tarlby (t) (c) 18:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumed after last protect expired. Multiple IPs, likely same person, copying article into its talk page. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring. CRBoyer 00:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Innacurate edits/maliciously made edits of Justin Chart's wikipedia page by user Rift. Label was changed from "Universal Music/records" to "Chart records" which is a defunct label. This page needs protection as asked by Justin Chart to preserve his prestige and works accurate. It is currently in semi protection and it should be fully protected. Angelbbkira (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:08, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent crypto-related promotion related to current events. czar 03:39, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP editors keep vandalizing the page. There is a very persistent IP editor who keeps adding the name of a non-notable individual to it, and it persists despite blocking the offending IP address. Chemtamengineer (talk) 03:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's been considerable edit warring from both IPs and newish accounts as consequence of Trump's inauguration. TarnishedPathtalk 06:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks TarnishedPathtalk 07:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 06:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry that this is happening and I hope this helps. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:16, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:RUSUKR Mr. Komori (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Requesting 90 days of semi protection, repeated entries (in particular IP entries) of Trump's inauguration despite consensus that the inauguration of world leaders is not notable enough FactsheetPete (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Have an IP changing colours dispite set colours and a map with same colours. Trying to talk to them to no avail User talk:2806:108E:18:843A:4893:1F52:B270:E194. Moxy🍁 07:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP edits requiring reverting as people don't check whether US withdrawal is already mentioned in article (it is). Given media attention, this is unlikely to stop soon. AncientWalrus (talk) 07:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Since filing this request I discovered that executive order withdrawing US from WHO was added at least 4 times in different places in a span of 6 hours. I can't keep the page orderly alone due to 3RR. The edits are well intentioned by editors making them but still create issues requiring at least semi-protection, ideally extended protection. It's not just IPs but also new editors making these mistakes (not checking if order is already mentioned), hence my suggestion to do extended protection. AncientWalrus (talk) 08:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:GSCASTE, persistent sockpuppetry by open proxies who are trying to redirect it to inappropriate targets. - Ratnahastin (talk) 08:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Misuse of talk page for stuff unrelated to the actual article. M.C. (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There is a user without a Wikipedia account consistently changing the age of this person from 1972 to 1962. This has been occurring since 2022. Hoggough (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A highly visited page about an ongoing event, attracting significant public interest. It has been subjected to frequent edits by random IP users, often introducing poor grammar and inappropriate language, which affects the page's quality and reliability. To ensure the information remains accurate and well-maintained, an 8-week semi-protection would be ideal during this period of heightened activity. - The9Man Talk 08:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, and socking from many IP adresses. Kajmer05 (talk) 08:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 09:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Rapid editing conflict due to recent political events. Atmois (talk) 09:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IPs keep changing his cause of death to "Homicide", even thouogh RSs say "Suicide", IPs cite no reliable sources. Possibly related to online 'conspiracy theories' [2]. Very few watchers on the page, it's just been me reverting them for almost a week. Wikiuser815 (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: This page has been fully protected from creation since 2007, which was a very long time ago. I don't know why it should have permanent full protection for almost 18 years, that's just overkill. Anyways I wanted to do something with this category, connect it with Category:State-sponsored terrorism, either as a super-category or at least a category redirect. So yes, may someone please unprotect this page? AHI-3000 (talk) 02:47, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Declined No longer exists. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)- @Dr vulpes: The request is to undo a creation protection, which is still present on the title. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Uggg thank you @Jéské Couriano, I'm still getting my bearings after a wiki-break and some nasty antibiotics. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- I sympathise. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Uggg thank you @Jéské Couriano, I'm still getting my bearings after a wiki-break and some nasty antibiotics. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes: The request is to undo a creation protection, which is still present on the title. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Remove: "Historians and political scientists rank Biden as above average in historical rankings of American presidents."
Way too soon to suggest that in the main text of the article! He has barely left office, its going to be at least a few months before such a bold claim can be made. Is there really enough historians and political scientists saying this to justify this claim? BlunanNation (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
330+ article creations with zero deletions. Have run into this editor's creations in New Page Review and do not have to do repairs; infoboxes, categories, wikilinks, short descriptions, talk pages, etc. are all in place. This editor does not need to be in the new pages feed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Fixing typos (乛-乛) (talk) 10:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Fixing typos Clubette (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights to edit and correct information on wikipedia Maximus O (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
As a wikipedia contributor, I have created several wikipedia articles and committed several edits to improve the wikipedia articles. I would love to contribute as a New page reviewer and it will help me to expand my contributions to Wikipedia. Ensconce (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I had the PCR userright, which was granted last year (request). While I had the flag, I didn't use it very much, so I requested the removal of the flag, which was granted. Since then, I keep finding myself looking at Special:PendingChanges and wanting to mark edits as reviewed. (Note that I also have rollback perms.) Thank you for your time and consideration! Relativity ⚡️ 01:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at PendingChanges, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the criteria for its use, especially in regard to BLP and countering vandalism. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. Additionally, I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions, and finally – as for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
To review changes on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. — W.andrea (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. Drdr150 (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
Requests for unblock | 30 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 2 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 29 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 3 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 698 |
Templates for deletion | 128 |
Categories for deletion | 2,577 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 131 |
All redirects for discussion | 462 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 5 |
Possible copyright violations | 22 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 253 |
All files proposed for deletion | 8 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 2 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 42 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 365 |
Unknown copyright status | 31 |
Unknown source | 21 |
No non-free use rationale | 1 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
Disputed non-free use images | 25 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,273 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 448 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,289 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 34,658 | 0.5 |
All articles needing rewrite | 6,070 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,335 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,388 | 0.58 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,270 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 538,374 | 7.75 |
All articles lacking sources | 69,897 | 1.01 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 21 | 0 |
All articles needing additional references | 477,369 | 6.88 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,660 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,618 | 1.52 |
All articles with dead external links | 300,236 | 4.32 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 135 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,241 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 822 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 4 | - |
Stub categories | 19,288 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 847 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 54,368 | 0.78 |
All articles needing copy edit | 2,311 | 0.03 |
All articles with style issues | 19,240 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,768 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,561 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 478 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,287 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,786 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 3 |
All articles to be expanded | 66,034 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]Misc
[edit]Delete | Keep | Neutral | Oppose | Support | Note | Template |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |