Talk:Aristotle's theory of universals

Untitled

This obviously needs expansion--even just to become an adequate minimal presentation of Aristotle's theory. It also seems to skew Plato's theory of universals, too -- (many scholars agree that Aristotle himself does this), and this could be corrected.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2020 and 10 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CJMcKenna98. Peer reviewers: Dhernandez98.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

see also section

I added a see also section. Although the links are mentioned in the text, I think it is good to have the section. Uriah923 15:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

..

• this page needs cleanup
• Agreed The Conundrumer^T_C 04:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• The biosphere comment towards the end does not make sense Amproff (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Rollback to previous version. Parent article is Aristotle, who formalized Aristotle's Theory of Universals. Well-documented with hundreds of citations given. The Problem of Universals redirect is full of obfusticating jargon, whereas apples are a concrete & reproducible real world example of real objects with observable properties which anyone can verify. Aristotle making zero assumptions in his ontology serves to minimize experimental bias. Not only are there hundreds of academic citations, but his name is in the title!! It has been made abundantly clear that Aristotle's Theory of Universals originates from Aristotle. If you believe that the article is unfairly biased then go to the nearest park or grocery store, obtain any fruit and check for yourself whether ordinary objects have physical properties. TheLastVegan (talk) 20:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)